REVIEW 1 cited by
This is not correct! Negation-aware Evaluation of Language Generation Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models underestimate the impact of negations on how much they change the meaning of a sentence. Therefore, learned evaluation metrics based on these models are insensitive to negations. In this paper, we propose NegBLEURT, a negation-aware version of the BLEURT evaluation metric. For that, we designed a rule-based sentence negation tool and used it to create the CANNOT negation evaluation dataset. Based on this dataset, we fine-tuned a sentence transformer and an evaluation metric to improve their negation sensitivity. Evaluating these models on existing benchmarks shows that our fine-tuned models outperform existing metrics on the negated sentences by far while preserving their base models' performances on other perturbations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Similarity Gates Approve Reversals: A Validity Audit of Embedding-Cosine Thresholds in Agent Systems
Embedding-cosine thresholds used as meaning gates instead measure lexical overlap, so in the target cases of reversal-versus-paraphrase the gates fire backwards; a matched-pair audit reveals the regime.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.