Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.16230 v7 pith:NZJP2OY4 submitted 2023-07-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords watermarkdetectionunforgeablealgorithmgenerationgithubhighhttps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, text watermarking algorithms for large language models (LLMs) have been proposed to mitigate the potential harms of text generated by LLMs, including fake news and copyright issues. However, current watermark detection algorithms require the secret key used in the watermark generation process, making them susceptible to security breaches and counterfeiting during public detection. To address this limitation, we propose an unforgeable publicly verifiable watermark algorithm named UPV that uses two different neural networks for watermark generation and detection, instead of using the same key at both stages. Meanwhile, the token embedding parameters are shared between the generation and detection networks, which makes the detection network achieve a high accuracy very efficiently. Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm attains high detection accuracy and computational efficiency through neural networks. Subsequent analysis confirms the high complexity involved in forging the watermark from the detection network. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/THU-BPM/unforgeable_watermark}{https://github.com/THU-BPM/unforgeable\_watermark}. Additionally, our algorithm could also be accessed through MarkLLM \citep{pan2024markllm} \footnote{https://github.com/THU-BPM/MarkLLM}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WaterMoE: Expert-Routing-based Watermarking for High Fidelity and Efficiency

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    WaterMoE watermarks MoE LLMs by adding a small secret bias to router expert selection, claiming near-zero quality loss, ~1% latency overhead, and strong detection.

  2. SAMark: A Self-Anchored Text Watermarking with Paragraph-Level Paraphrase Robustness

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    SAMark uses self-anchored semantic green regions, multi-channel hyperbolic scoring, and diversity-aware filtering to reach 90.2% TP@FP1% detection under paragraph paraphrasing while preserving text quality.

  3. LLM Watermark Evasion via Bias Inversion

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Applying a negative logit bias to high-surprisal tokens during LLM paraphrasing drops the green-token rate below the detector threshold, driving watermark detection probability down exponentially and yielding over 99%...

Pith tools