Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Wrinkles in the Froggatt-Nielsen Mechanism and Flavorful New Physics

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 2 Aug 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that an effective way to keep track of these changes is by using the new spurions of the $\mathrm{U}(3)^5$ global flavor symmetry, where we parameterize extra suppression or enhancement factors, referred to as wrinkles, using the same power counting parameter as in the original Froggatt-Nielsen model.

how it is stated · asserted 0.97 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2308.01340 (version 1)
Pith IDM57DPBYI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAditya Parikh, Arindam Bhattacharya, Katherine Fraser, Pouya Asadi, Samuel Homiller. "Wrinkles in the Froggatt-Nielsen Mechanism and Flavorful New Physics." arXiv:2308.01340 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/M57DPBYI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,493 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.52 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

When the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism is used to explain the Standard Model flavor hierarchy, new physics couplings are also determined by the horizontal symmetry. However, additional symmetries or dynamics in the UV can sometimes lead to a departure from this na\"ive scaling for the new physics couplings. We show that an effective way to keep track of these changes is by using the new spurions of the $\mathrm{U}(3)^5$ global flavor symmetry, where we parameterize extra suppression or enhancement factors, referred to as wrinkles, using the same power counting parameter as in the original Froggatt-Nielsen model. As a concrete realization, we consider two flavor spurions of the $S_1$ leptoquark, and demonstrate that wrinkles can be used to make an enhanced value of $\textrm{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar{\nu})$ consistent with other flavor observables. We also present example UV models that realize wrinkles, and comment on choosing consistent charges in ordinary Froggatt-Nielsen models without the typical monotonicity condition.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 When the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism is used to explain the Standard Model flavor hierarchy, new physics couplings are also determined by the horizontal symmetry. background 1.00 0.06 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 However, additional symmetries or dynamics in the UV can sometimes lead to a departure from this na\"ive scaling for the new physics couplings. background 0.74 0.06 0.04 hedged possibility 0.99
s2 We show that an effective way to keep track of these changes is by using the new spurions of the $\mathrm{U}(3)^5$ global flavor symmetry, where we parameterize extra suppression or enhancement factors, referred to as wrinkles, using the same power counting parameter as in the original Froggatt-Nielsen model. method 0.70 0.92 0.51 asserted 0.97
s3 As a concrete realization, we consider two flavor spurions of the $S_1$ leptoquark, and demonstrate that wrinkles can be used to make an enhanced value of $\textrm{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar{\nu})$ consistent with other flavor observables. result 0.52 0.94 0.33 asserted 0.94
s4 We also present example UV models that realize wrinkles, and comment on choosing consistent charges in ordinary Froggatt-Nielsen models without the typical monotonicity condition. contribution 0.96 0.90 0.10 asserted 0.92

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.72 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

When the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism is used to explain the Standard Model flavor hierarchy, new physics couplings are also determined by the horizontal symmetry. However, additional symmetries or dynamics in the UV can sometimes lead to a departure from this na\"ive scaling for the new physics couplings. We show that an effective way to keep track of these changes is by using the new spurions of the $\mathrm{U}(3)^5$ global flavor symmetry, where we parameterize extra suppression or enhancement factors, referred to as wrinkles, using the same power counting parameter as in the original Froggatt-Nielsen model. As a concrete realization, we consider two flavor spurions of the $S_1$ leptoquark, and demonstrate that wrinkles can be used to make an enhanced value of $\textrm{BR}(B^+ \to K^+\nu\bar{\nu})$ consistent with other flavor observables. We also present example UV models that realize wrinkles, and comment on choosing consistent charges in ordinary Froggatt-Nielsen models without the typical monotonicity condition.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

15 arXiv papers cite this in 15 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers
  • However, a first measurement by Belle II of the branching ratio $ℬ(B^+→K^+νν̅) = (2.3±0.7)×10^-5$ [ref] , is $2.7σ$ higher than the SM expectation $ℬ(B^+→K^+ νν̅)_SM=(5.58±0.38)×10^-6$ [ref] , and has revived interest in NC $B$ decays [ref] ; an earlier upper limit by Belle II [ref] also led to a flurry of theoretical activity [ref] .

    $B \to K \nu\bar\nu$, MiniBooNE and muon $g-2$ anomalies from a dark sector · Introduction · 0.88

  • Combining this result with earlier measurements from BaBar [ref] and Belle [ref] , the weighted average branching ratio (BR) is determined to be [equation] This measurement deviates from the standard model (SM) prediction, $B(B^+→K^+ νν̅)^SM=(4.92±0.30) ×10^-6$ [ref] , by $2.7 σ$, suggesting a possible manifest of new physics in the $b→s E$ transitions [ref] .

    Leptoquark-mediated Dirac neutrino mass and its impact on $B \to K \nu \bar{\nu}$ and $K \to \pi \nu \bar{\nu}$ decays · Introduction · 0.97

Cites it as background 6 papers

What it cites · 147 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 10 papers
Uses data or values from 16 papers
Cites as support 2 papers
Cites as background 43 papers
  • The two most popular solutions to this puzzle are (i) the Froggatt–Nielsen (FN) mechanism and its variations [ref] , and (ii) extra dimensional models where an $𝒪(1)$ difference in the bulk masses of fermions gives rise to an exponential hierarchy between the observed masses in the IR [ref] .

    Mass Matrix Models · Aperitif · 0.97

  • The two most popular solutions to this puzzle are (i) the Froggatt–Nielsen (FN) mechanism and its variations [ref] , and (ii) extra dimensional models where an $𝒪(1)$ difference in the bulk masses of fermions gives rise to an exponential hierarchy between the observed masses in the IR [ref] .

    New Tools for Fermion Masses from Extra Dimensions · Aperitif · 0.97

  • The two most popular solutions to this puzzle are (i) the Froggatt–Nielsen (FN) mechanism and its variations [ref] , and (ii) extra dimensional models where an $𝒪(1)$ difference in the bulk masses of fermions gives rise to an exponential hierarchy between the observed masses in the IR [ref] .

    Fermion Masses, Mixings and Proton Decay in a Randall-Sundrum Model · Aperitif · 0.97

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.