REVIEW 2 cited by
A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open-ended responses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Open-ended questions are a favored tool among instructors for assessing student understanding and encouraging critical exploration of course material. Providing feedback for such responses is a time-consuming task that can lead to overwhelmed instructors and decreased feedback quality. Many instructors resort to simpler question formats, like multiple-choice questions, which provide immediate feedback but at the expense of personalized and insightful comments. Here, we present a tool that uses large language models (LLMs), guided by instructor-defined criteria, to automate responses to open-ended questions. Our tool delivers rapid personalized feedback, enabling students to quickly test their knowledge and identify areas for improvement. We provide open-source reference implementations both as a web application and as a Jupyter Notebook widget that can be used with instructional coding or math notebooks. With instructor guidance, LLMs hold promise to enhance student learning outcomes and elevate instructional methodologies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CRABS: A syntactic-semantic pincer strategy for bounding LLM interpretation of Python notebooks
CRABS combines AST bounds with an LLM to reconstruct information flow and execution dependency graphs for Python notebooks, reaching 98% F1 on 50 curated Kaggle notebooks.
-
Classroom Simulacra: Building Contextual Student Generative Agents in Online Education for Learning Behavioral Simulation
A new reflection-based AI method makes LLM-generated virtual students predict real students' future quiz performance better than deep learning knowledge-tracing baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.