Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.02498 v1 pith:3WQWNPOT submitted 2023-07-21 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords noisyannotationslabelsegmentationspatialapproachbiascorrection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Noisy labels can significantly affect the performance of deep neural networks (DNNs). In medical image segmentation tasks, annotations are error-prone due to the high demand in annotation time and in the annotators' expertise. Existing methods mostly assume noisy labels in different pixels are \textit{i.i.d}. However, segmentation label noise usually has strong spatial correlation and has prominent bias in distribution. In this paper, we propose a novel Markov model for segmentation noisy annotations that encodes both spatial correlation and bias. Further, to mitigate such label noise, we propose a label correction method to recover true label progressively. We provide theoretical guarantees of the correctness of the proposed method. Experiments show that our approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real-world noisy annotations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoupled Single-Mask Annotation Noise Detection via Cross-Sectional Patch Self-Consistency

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Cross-sectional patches with near-identical intensity but inconsistent masks are flagged as annotation noise, revealing systematic orientation-dependent bias in single-rater vascular CT labels.

Pith tools