Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Data Augmentation-Based Unsupervised Domain Adaptation In Medical Imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.04395 v1 pith:LA7VCF6E submitted 2023-08-08 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords domainadaptationdataimagingmedicalmethodmodelssegmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning-based models in medical imaging often struggle to generalize effectively to new scans due to data heterogeneity arising from differences in hardware, acquisition parameters, population, and artifacts. This limitation presents a significant challenge in adopting machine learning models for clinical practice. We propose an unsupervised method for robust domain adaptation in brain MRI segmentation by leveraging MRI-specific augmentation techniques. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we conduct extensive experiments across diverse datasets, modalities, and segmentation tasks, comparing against the state-of-the-art methods. The results show that our proposed approach achieves high accuracy, exhibits broad applicability, and showcases remarkable robustness against domain shift in various tasks, surpassing the state-of-the-art performance in the majority of cases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Scalable and Robust White Matter Lesion Localization via Multimodal Deep Learning

    eess.IV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the MICCAI WMH dataset, concatenated FLAIR and T1 inputs achieved the best lesion Dice (0.74), while joint multi-task lesion-region segmentation was markedly worse (0.43) than single-task models.

Pith tools