REVIEW 1 cited by
Diagnostic Reasoning Prompts Reveal the Potential for Large Language Model Interpretability in Medicine
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
One of the major barriers to using large language models (LLMs) in medicine is the perception they use uninterpretable methods to make clinical decisions that are inherently different from the cognitive processes of clinicians. In this manuscript we develop novel diagnostic reasoning prompts to study whether LLMs can perform clinical reasoning to accurately form a diagnosis. We find that GPT4 can be prompted to mimic the common clinical reasoning processes of clinicians without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. This is significant because an LLM that can use clinical reasoning to provide an interpretable rationale offers physicians a means to evaluate whether LLMs can be trusted for patient care. Novel prompting methods have the potential to expose the black box of LLMs, bringing them one step closer to safe and effective use in medicine.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Agent-Centric Projection of Prompting Techniques and Implications for Synthetic Training Data for Large Language Models
The paper defines linear and non-linear interaction contexts for LLMs and conjectures that prompting techniques and multi-agent systems are equivalent projections of the same patterns.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.