Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Physics-guided training of GAN to improve accuracy in airfoil design synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10038 v1 pith:BNXKORLC submitted 2023-08-19 cs.LG

Physics-guided training of GAN to improve accuracy in airfoil design synthesis

classification cs.LG
keywords modelshapesphysicaltrainingdatabecausemodelsnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GAN) have recently been used for a design synthesis of mechanical shapes. A GAN sometimes outputs physically unreasonable shapes. For example, when a GAN model is trained to output airfoil shapes that indicate required aerodynamic performance, significant errors occur in the performance values. This is because the GAN model only considers data but does not consider the aerodynamic equations that lie under the data. This paper proposes the physics-guided training of the GAN model to guide the model to learn physical validity. Physical validity is computed using general-purpose software located outside the neural network model. Such general-purpose software cannot be used in physics-informed neural network frameworks, because physical equations must be implemented inside the neural network models. Additionally, a limitation of generative models is that the output data are similar to the training data and cannot generate completely new shapes. However, because the proposed model is guided by a physical model and does not use a training dataset, it can generate completely new shapes. Numerical experiments show that the proposed model drastically improves the accuracy. Moreover, the output shapes differ from those of the training dataset but still satisfy the physical validity, overcoming the limitations of existing GAN models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flow marching for a generative PDE foundation model

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Flow Marching jointly samples noise and physical time to learn a velocity field for generative PDE modeling, paired with a latent autoencoder and efficient transformer for large-scale pretraining on 2.5M trajectories.