Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hybrid classical-quantum computing: are we forgetting the classical part in the binomial?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10513 v1 pith:XNGZNUSI submitted 2023-08-21 quant-ph cs.AIcs.ET

classification quant-phcs.AIcs.ET
keywords computinghybridquantumclassicalchallengesfieldquestionsresearchers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The expectations arising from the latest achievements in the quantum computing field are causing that researchers coming from classical artificial intelligence to be fascinated by this new paradigm. In turn, quantum computing, on the road towards usability, needs classical procedures. Hybridization is, in these circumstances, an indispensable step but can also be seen as a promising new avenue to get the most from both computational worlds. Nonetheless, hybrid approaches have now and will have in the future many challenges to face, which, if ignored, will threaten the viability or attractiveness of quantum computing for real-world applications. To identify them and pose pertinent questions, a proper characterization of the hybrid quantum computing field, and especially hybrid solvers, is compulsory. With this motivation in mind, the main purpose of this work is to propose a preliminary taxonomy for classifying hybrid schemes, and bring to the fore some questions to stir up researchers minds about the real challenges regarding the application of quantum computing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools