Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10835 v2 pith:UMHIU6IP submitted 2023-08-21 cs.IR

Enhancing Recommender Systems with Large Language Model Reasoning Graphs

classification cs.IR
keywords reasoninggraphssystemsuserapproachgraphllmrgrecommendation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommendation systems aim to provide users with relevant suggestions, but often lack interpretability and fail to capture higher-level semantic relationships between user behaviors and profiles. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) to construct personalized reasoning graphs. These graphs link a user's profile and behavioral sequences through causal and logical inferences, representing the user's interests in an interpretable way. Our approach, LLM reasoning graphs (LLMRG), has four components: chained graph reasoning, divergent extension, self-verification and scoring, and knowledge base self-improvement. The resulting reasoning graph is encoded using graph neural networks, which serves as additional input to improve conventional recommender systems, without requiring extra user or item information. Our approach demonstrates how LLMs can enable more logical and interpretable recommender systems through personalized reasoning graphs. LLMRG allows recommendations to benefit from both engineered recommendation systems and LLM-derived reasoning graphs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LLMRG on benchmarks and real-world scenarios in enhancing base recommendation models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2023-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    Time-LLM reprograms frozen LLMs for time series forecasting via text prototypes and Prompt-as-Prefix, outperforming specialized models in standard, few-shot, and zero-shot settings.

  2. EHRAG: Bridging Semantic Gaps in Lightweight GraphRAG via Hybrid Hypergraph Construction and Retrieval

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EHRAG constructs structural hyperedges from sentence co-occurrence and semantic hyperedges from entity embedding clusters, then applies hybrid diffusion plus topic-aware PPR to retrieve top-k documents, outperforming ...

  3. Autonomous Information Seeking: A Roadmap for Agentic Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0

    Agentic recommender systems are organized by agent role (assisted, as-recommender, as-simulator) crossed with autonomy levels L2–L5, yielding a roadmap of architectures, evaluation limits, and open challenges.

  4. Fine-Tuned LLM as a Complementary Predictor Improving Ads System

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fine-tuned LLM acts as ancillary advertiser predictor in production ads RecSys, augmenting retrieval and ranking with measurable offline and online gains.