Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High Dynamic Range Imaging of Dynamic Scenes with Saturation Compensation but without Explicit Motion Compensation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11140 v1 pith:NBEXFOM7 submitted 2023-08-22 cs.CV

High Dynamic Range Imaging of Dynamic Scenes with Saturation Compensation but without Explicit Motion Compensation

classification cs.CV
keywords compensationdynamicmethodsareasimaginginformationmotionrange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

High dynamic range (HDR) imaging is a highly challenging task since a large amount of information is lost due to the limitations of camera sensors. For HDR imaging, some methods capture multiple low dynamic range (LDR) images with altering exposures to aggregate more information. However, these approaches introduce ghosting artifacts when significant inter-frame motions are present. Moreover, although multi-exposure images are given, we have little information in severely over-exposed areas. Most existing methods focus on motion compensation, i.e., alignment of multiple LDR shots to reduce the ghosting artifacts, but they still produce unsatisfying results. These methods also rather overlook the need to restore the saturated areas. In this paper, we generate well-aligned multi-exposure features by reformulating a motion alignment problem into a simple brightness adjustment problem. In addition, we propose a coarse-to-fine merging strategy with explicit saturation compensation. The saturated areas are reconstructed with similar well-exposed content using adaptive contextual attention. We demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods regarding qualitative and quantitative evaluations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.