Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Evaluating Large Language Models on Graphs: Performance Insights and Comparative Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11224 v2 pith:PFGCBWSW submitted 2023-08-22 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsmodelsgraphdatalanguagecorrectnessfidelityfour
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered considerable interest within both academic and industrial. Yet, the application of LLMs to graph data remains under-explored. In this study, we evaluate the capabilities of four LLMs in addressing several analytical problems with graph data. We employ four distinct evaluation metrics: Comprehension, Correctness, Fidelity, and Rectification. Our results show that: 1) LLMs effectively comprehend graph data in natural language and reason with graph topology. 2) GPT models can generate logical and coherent results, outperforming alternatives in correctness. 3) All examined LLMs face challenges in structural reasoning, with techniques like zero-shot chain-of-thought and few-shot prompting showing diminished efficacy. 4) GPT models often produce erroneous answers in multi-answer tasks, raising concerns in fidelity. 5) GPT models exhibit elevated confidence in their outputs, potentially hindering their rectification capacities. Notably, GPT-4 has demonstrated the capacity to rectify responses from GPT-3.5-turbo and its own previous iterations. The code is available at: https://github.com/Ayame1006/LLMtoGraph.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GraphTool-Instruction: Revolutionizing Graph Reasoning in LLMs through Decomposed Subtask Instruction

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Decomposing graph reasoning into graph extraction, tool name identification, and tool parameter extraction subtasks yields large accuracy gains on small LLMs and a fine-tuned 8B model that competes with GPT-4o.

  2. Investigating Student Interaction Patterns with Large Language Model-Powered Course Assistants in Computer Science Courses

    cs.CY 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deployed LLM course assistant served 589 students across three CS courses; logs show heavy evening use and homework questions, while only about 11% of responses included AI follow-ups that students mostly ignored.

  3. CARL-GT: Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A causal reasoning benchmark with graph and tabular data shows open-source LLMs are weak at causal discovery from tables, and reveals that task correlations do not align with the benchmark's three categories.

Pith tools