Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Security Assessment and Hardening of Fog Computing Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12707 v1 pith:K2MSXYXQ submitted 2023-08-24 cs.CR

Security Assessment and Hardening of Fog Computing Systems

classification cs.CR
keywords securitycomputingtechniquesarchitecturesassessmentdataedgehardening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In recent years, there has been a shift in computing architectures, moving away from centralized cloud computing towards decentralized edge and fog computing. This shift is driven by factors such as the increasing volume of data generated at the edge, the growing demand for real-time processing and low-latency applications, and the need for improved privacy and data locality. Although this new paradigm offers numerous advantages, it also introduces significant security and reliability challenges. This paper aims to review the architectures and technologies employed in fog computing and identify opportunities for developing novel security assessment and security hardening techniques. These techniques include secure configuration and debloating to enhance the security of middleware, testing techniques to assess secure communication mechanisms, and automated rehosting to speed up the security testing of embedded firmware.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en rob\'otica y sistemas aut\'onomos: una revisi\'on sistem\'atica de la literatura

    cs.CY 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    A PRISMA review claims robotics research only partially meets EU AI Act requirements, with big gaps in transparency, human oversight, and traceability.