Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Characterizing Learning Curves During Language Model Pre-Training: Learning, Forgetting, and Stability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15419 v2 pith:XHXDT54H submitted 2023-08-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords learningpre-traininglanguagemodeltokenscurvesduringn-gram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How do language models learn to make predictions during pre-training? To study this, we extract learning curves from five autoregressive English language model pre-training runs, for 1M unseen tokens in context. We observe that the language models generate short repetitive phrases before learning to generate longer and more coherent text. We also find that individual tokens often exhibit sudden increases or decreases in loss that are surprisingly consistent across pre-training runs. To better understand these fluctuations, we quantify the final surprisal, within-run variability, age of acquisition, forgettability, and cross-run variability of learning curves for individual tokens in context. More frequent tokens reach lower final surprisals, exhibit less variability within and across pre-training runs, are learned earlier, and are less likely to be "forgotten" during pre-training. Higher n-gram probabilities further accentuate these effects. Independent of the target token, shorter and more frequent contexts correlate with marginally more stable and quickly acquired predictions. Based on our results, we argue for the existence of sequential learning dependencies between different model capabilities, and we characterize language model learning as early n-gram learning before gradual refinement of tail n-gram predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time Course MechInterp: Analyzing the Evolution of Components and Knowledge in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Over 40 checkpoints of OLMo-7B, attention heads and FFNs shift from general-purpose to specialized roles for factual recall, with location-based facts learned earlier and more stably than name-based facts.

Pith tools