Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Implicit Neural Image Stitching

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 4 Sep 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our experiments show that our approach achieves improvement in resolving the low-definition imaging of the previous deep image stitching with favorable accelerated image-enhancing methods.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2309.01409 (version 5)
Pith ID77N7GTQF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationByeonghun Lee, Jaewon Lee, Kyong Hwan Jin, Minsu Kim, Sunghoon Im. "Implicit Neural Image Stitching." arXiv:2309.01409 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/77N7GTQF
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,063 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.38 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.89 · mentions code or data availability 0.98.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v5. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Existing frameworks for image stitching often provide visually reasonable stitchings. However, they suffer from blurry artifacts and disparities in illumination, depth level, etc. Although the recent learning-based stitchings relax such disparities, the required methods impose sacrifice of image qualities failing to capture high-frequency details for stitched images. To address the problem, we propose a novel approach, implicit Neural Image Stitching (NIS) that extends arbitrary-scale super-resolution. Our method estimates Fourier coefficients of images for quality-enhancing warps. Then, the suggested model blends color mismatches and misalignment in the latent space and decodes the features into RGB values of stitched images. Our experiments show that our approach achieves improvement in resolving the low-definition imaging of the previous deep image stitching with favorable accelerated image-enhancing methods. Our source code is available at https://github.com/minshu-kim/NIS.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Existing frameworks for image stitching often provide visually reasonable stitchings. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.94
s1 However, they suffer from blurry artifacts and disparities in illumination, depth level, etc. background 0.78 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Although the recent learning-based stitchings relax such disparities, the required methods impose sacrifice of image qualities failing to capture high-frequency details for stitched images. gap 0.50 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 To address the problem, we propose a novel approach, implicit Neural Image Stitching (NIS) that extends arbitrary-scale super-resolution. contribution 1.00 0.80 0.12 asserted 0.98
s4 Our method estimates Fourier coefficients of images for quality-enhancing warps. method 0.99 0.87 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 Then, the suggested model blends color mismatches and misalignment in the latent space and decodes the features into RGB values of stitched images. method 1.00 0.82 0.05 asserted 1.00
s6 Our experiments show that our approach achieves improvement in resolving the low-definition imaging of the previous deep image stitching with favorable accelerated image-enhancing methods. result 1.00 0.95 0.74 asserted 1.00
s7 Our source code is available at https://github.com/minshu-kim/NIS. contribution 0.56 0.40 0.02 asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v5
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Existing frameworks for image stitching often provide visually reasonable stitchings. However, they suffer from blurry artifacts and disparities in illumination, depth level, etc. Although the recent learning-based stitchings relax such disparities, the required methods impose sacrifice of image qualities failing to capture high-frequency details for stitched images. To address the problem, we propose a novel approach, implicit Neural Image Stitching (NIS) that extends arbitrary-scale super-resolution. Our method estimates Fourier coefficients of images for quality-enhancing warps. Then, the suggested model blends color mismatches and misalignment in the latent space and decodes the features into RGB values of stitched images. Our experiments show that our approach achieves improvement in resolving the low-definition imaging of the previous deep image stitching with favorable accelerated image-enhancing methods. Our source code is available at https://github.com/minshu-kim/NIS.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.