Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Physics Informed Reinforcement Learning: Review and Open Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.01909 v1 pith:FRR6TE6N submitted 2023-09-05 cs.LG cs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords learningreinforcementphysicsphysicalexistingpirltaxonomyworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The inclusion of physical information in machine learning frameworks has revolutionized many application areas. This involves enhancing the learning process by incorporating physical constraints and adhering to physical laws. In this work we explore their utility for reinforcement learning applications. We present a thorough review of the literature on incorporating physics information, as known as physics priors, in reinforcement learning approaches, commonly referred to as physics-informed reinforcement learning (PIRL). We introduce a novel taxonomy with the reinforcement learning pipeline as the backbone to classify existing works, compare and contrast them, and derive crucial insights. Existing works are analyzed with regard to the representation/ form of the governing physics modeled for integration, their specific contribution to the typical reinforcement learning architecture, and their connection to the underlying reinforcement learning pipeline stages. We also identify core learning architectures and physics incorporation biases (i.e., observational, inductive and learning) of existing PIRL approaches and use them to further categorize the works for better understanding and adaptation. By providing a comprehensive perspective on the implementation of the physics-informed capability, the taxonomy presents a cohesive approach to PIRL. It identifies the areas where this approach has been applied, as well as the gaps and opportunities that exist. Additionally, the taxonomy sheds light on unresolved issues and challenges, which can guide future research. This nascent field holds great potential for enhancing reinforcement learning algorithms by increasing their physical plausibility, precision, data efficiency, and applicability in real-world scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics-enhanced reinforcement learning for real-time optimal control of dynamical systems

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PEARL trains a policy by differentiating a short horizon of the simulator and using a learned adjoint network to account for long-term return gradients, beating PPO, TD3, BPTT, and SHAC on two double-gyre navigation tasks.

  2. Self-Evolving Scientific Agent Discovers Generalizable Physically-Reasoned Fluid Control

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-based self-evolving agent discovers a traveling-wave controller with body-frame guidance and yaw feedback that generalizes to unseen targets for an underactuated fluid swimmer.

  3. TRIDENT: Breaking the Hybrid-Safety-Physics Coupling for Provably Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    TRIDENT is a MARL framework using Richardson-Romberg gradient correction, Lyapunov-constrained trust-region updates, and a physics-informed residual critic that claims O(1/sqrt(K)) convergence to constrained Nash equi...

  4. SALSA-RL: Stability Analysis in the Latent Space of Actions for Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SALSA-RL introduces latent-space stability analysis for actions of pretrained RL agents using encoder-decoder and state-dependent linear dynamics to enable non-invasive interpretability.

Pith tools