Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias Propagation in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.02160 v1 pith:CZKP4CRS submitted 2023-09-05 cs.LG cs.CYstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CYstat.ML
keywords biaslearningfederatedpartiesmodelpropagationattributesfairness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that participating in federated learning can be detrimental to group fairness. In fact, the bias of a few parties against under-represented groups (identified by sensitive attributes such as gender or race) can propagate through the network to all the parties in the network. We analyze and explain bias propagation in federated learning on naturally partitioned real-world datasets. Our analysis reveals that biased parties unintentionally yet stealthily encode their bias in a small number of model parameters, and throughout the training, they steadily increase the dependence of the global model on sensitive attributes. What is important to highlight is that the experienced bias in federated learning is higher than what parties would otherwise encounter in centralized training with a model trained on the union of all their data. This indicates that the bias is due to the algorithm. Our work calls for auditing group fairness in federated learning and designing learning algorithms that are robust to bias propagation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Survey experiment finds that people apply more deontological standards to AI described as human-programmed and to the programmers themselves than to unaided humans or unprogrammed robots in a moral dilemma.

Pith tools