Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Unifying over-smoothing and over-squashing in graph neural networks: A physics informed approach and beyond

Machine Learning · Submitted 6 Sep 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our conclusive experiments highlight the effectiveness of proposed models.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2309.02769 (version 2)
Pith IDW4KCA3LC, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndi Han, Dai Shi, Junbin Gao, Qibin Zhao, Yi Guo, Zhiqi Shao. "Unifying over-smoothing and over-squashing in graph neural networks: A physics informed approach and beyond." arXiv:2309.02769 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/W4KCA3LC
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,642 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.74 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.86 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as one of the leading approaches for machine learning on graph-structured data. Despite their great success, critical computational challenges such as over-smoothing, over-squashing, and limited expressive power continue to impact the performance of GNNs. In this study, inspired from the time-reversal principle commonly utilized in classical and quantum physics, we reverse the time direction of the graph heat equation. The resulted reversing process yields a class of high pass filtering functions that enhance the sharpness of graph node features. Leveraging this concept, we introduce the Multi-Scaled Heat Kernel based GNN (MHKG) by amalgamating diverse filtering functions' effects on node features. To explore more flexible filtering conditions, we further generalize MHKG into a model termed G-MHKG and thoroughly show the roles of each element in controlling over-smoothing, over-squashing and expressive power. Notably, we illustrate that all aforementioned issues can be characterized and analyzed via the properties of the filtering functions, and uncover a trade-off between over-smoothing and over-squashing: enhancing node feature sharpness will make model suffer more from over-squashing, and vice versa. Furthermore, we manipulate the time again to show how G-MHKG can handle both two issues under mild conditions. Our conclusive experiments highlight the effectiveness of proposed models. It surpasses several GNN baseline models in performance across graph datasets characterized by both homophily and heterophily.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as one of the leading approaches for machine learning on graph-structured data. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Despite their great success, critical computational challenges such as over-smoothing, over-squashing, and limited expressive power continue to impact the performance of GNNs. background 0.76 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 In this study, inspired from the time-reversal principle commonly utilized in classical and quantum physics, we reverse the time direction of the graph heat equation. method 0.79 0.90 0.03 asserted 0.97
s3 The resulted reversing process yields a class of high pass filtering functions that enhance the sharpness of graph node features. result 0.71 0.91 0.06 asserted 1.00
s4 Leveraging this concept, we introduce the Multi-Scaled Heat Kernel based GNN (MHKG) by amalgamating diverse filtering functions' effects on node features. method 0.57 0.94 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 To explore more flexible filtering conditions, we further generalize MHKG into a model termed G-MHKG and thoroughly show the roles of each element in controlling over-smoothing, over-squashing and expressive power. contribution 0.70 0.94 0.09 asserted 1.00
s6 Notably, we illustrate that all aforementioned issues can be characterized and analyzed via the properties of the filtering functions, and uncover a trade-off between over-smoothing and over-squashing: enhancing node feature sharpness will make model suffer more from over-squashing, and vice versa. result 0.54 0.94 0.51 asserted 1.00
s7 Furthermore, we manipulate the time again to show how G-MHKG can handle both two issues under mild conditions. method 0.57 0.94 0.12 asserted 0.98
s8 Our conclusive experiments highlight the effectiveness of proposed models. result 0.98 0.91 0.45 asserted 1.00
s9 It surpasses several GNN baseline models in performance across graph datasets characterized by both homophily and heterophily. result 1.00 0.90 0.27 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as one of the leading approaches for machine learning on graph-structured data. Despite their great success, critical computational challenges such as over-smoothing, over-squashing, and limited expressive power continue to impact the performance of GNNs. In this study, inspired from the time-reversal principle commonly utilized in classical and quantum physics, we reverse the time direction of the graph heat equation. The resulted reversing process yields a class of high pass filtering functions that enhance the sharpness of graph node features. Leveraging this concept, we introduce the Multi-Scaled Heat Kernel based GNN (MHKG) by amalgamating diverse filtering functions' effects on node features. To explore more flexible filtering conditions, we further generalize MHKG into a model termed G-MHKG and thoroughly show the roles of each element in controlling over-smoothing, over-squashing and expressive power. Notably, we illustrate that all aforementioned issues can be characterized and analyzed via the properties of the filtering functions, and uncover a trade-off between over-smoothing and over-squashing: enhancing node feature sharpness will make model suffer more from over-squashing, and vice versa. Furthermore, we manipulate the time again to show how G-MHKG can handle both two issues under mild conditions. Our conclusive experiments highlight the effectiveness of proposed models. It surpasses several GNN baseline models in performance across graph datasets characterized by both homophily and heterophily.

Human review
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 17 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 13 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 16 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
Cites as support 2 papers
  • Recent research on GNNs dynamics [ref] suggests that to induce HFD, the weight matrix $𝐖$ must be symmetric and contain at least one negative eigenvalue.

    Understanding convolution on graphs via energies · Filtering matrices control model dynamics & over-smoothing · 0.96

  • Furthermore, it is straightforward to verify that single-scale GNN [ref] may satisfy the conditions of frequency dominance described in Theorem [ref],

    Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks · Filtering matrices control model dynamics & over-smoothing · 0.96

Cites as background 4 papers
  • Moreover, recent studies also attempted to mitigate both issues via graph surgery by dropping highly positive cured edges which often lead to over-smoothing issue [ref] and rewiring the communities connected with very negatively curved edges which is responsible for the over-squashing issue [ref] .

    On the Trade-off between Over-smoothing and Over-squashing in Deep Graph Neural Networks · Time manipulation: How to handle two issues and beyond · 0.85

  • In terms of GNNs, we note that in general there are two types of GNNs, the spatial-based GNNs such as graph convolution network (GCN) [ref] defines the layer-wise propagation rule via the normalized adjacency matrix as [equation] where we let $𝐇^(t)$ as the feature matrix at layer $t$ with $𝐇^(0) = 𝐗 ∈ℝ^N ×c$, the input feature matrix, and $𝐖^(t)$ is the learnable weight matrix performing channel mixing.

    Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks · Preliminaries · 0.87

  • Within the diverse research avenues of GNNs, one prominent aspect is to interpret GNNs via different perspectives, such as gradient flow [ref] , neural diffusion [ref] , and testing of graph isomorphism [ref] , all of which contribute to a deeper comprehension of GNNs' underlying working mechanism.

    Understanding convolution on graphs via energies · Introduction · 0.97

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.