Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHF

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.06256 v4 pith:ZGHDMJIN submitted 2023-09-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords alignmentmodelrlhfaveragingperformancelayersalignment-forgettingforgetting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

LLMs acquire a wide range of abilities during pre-training, but aligning LLMs under Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) can lead to forgetting pretrained abilities, which is also known as the alignment tax. To investigate alignment tax, we conducted experiments with existing RLHF algorithms using OpenLLaMA-3B, which revealed a pronounced alignment tax in NLP tasks. Whereas, despite various techniques to mitigate forgetting, they are often at odds with the RLHF performance, leading to a trade-off between alignment performance and forgetting mitigation, leading to an alignment-forgetting trade-off. In this paper we show that model averaging, which simply interpolates between pre and post RLHF model weights, surprisingly achieves the most strongest alignment-forgetting Pareto front among a wide range of competing methods. To understand its effectiveness, we offer theoretical insights into model averaging, revealing that it enhances performance Pareto front by increasing feature diversity on the layers where tasks share overlapped feature spaces. Empirical evidence corroborates our analysis by showing the benefits of averaging low-level transformer layers. Building on the analysis and the observation that averaging different layers of the transformer leads to significantly different alignment-forgetting trade-offs, we propose Heterogeneous Model Averaging (HMA) to Heterogeneously find various combination ratios of model layers. HMA seeks to maximize the alignment performance while incurring minimal alignment tax. Moreover, we validate HMA's performance across a range of RLHF algorithms over OpenLLaMA-3B and further extend our findings to Mistral-7B which is evaluated by open-sourced preference model and GPT4. Code available here: https://github.com/avalonstrel/Mitigating-the-Alignment-Tax-of-RLHF.git.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation with Prefix Replay

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReOPD offline-distills multi-turn agentic LLMs via teacher-prefix replay plus step-decay sampling, matching online OPD accuracy at ≥4× speed with zero tool calls.

  2. Helpfulness Hurts: Domain-Dependent Degradation of Mid-Trained Compassion Values Under Post-Training

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Helpfulness SFT/GRPO degrades mid-trained animal compassion far more than coding SFT/GRPO on ANIMA, with the compassion effect transferring cross-lingually while general moral-reasoning gains do not.

  3. Cycle Context Verification for In-Context Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CCV learns a query-specific prompt that maximizes a cyclic self-verification accuracy on available in-context pairs, improving in-context medical image segmentation.

  4. Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementary

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Jointly training a Bradley-Terry preference head and a multi-attribute regression head on a shared embedding improves reward-model robustness to reward hacking and boosts multi-objective scoring performance.

  5. Understanding Overadaptation in Supervised Fine-Tuning: The Role of Ensemble Methods

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Weight averaging of pretrained and fine-tuned models is shown, in a linear model and on three LLM families, to reduce overadaptation and improve both downstream and retained knowledge.

  6. ExeSQL: Self-Taught Text-to-SQL Models with Execution-Driven Bootstrapping for SQL Dialects

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Execution-driven bootstrapping, where a model generates SQL, executes it, and keeps only queries that run, lets a 7B model outperform GPT-4o on PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Oracle text-to-SQL benchmarks.

  7. A Taxonomy of Cognitive Capability Gaps in Generative and Agentic AI

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper organizes persistent AI limitations into a five-part taxonomy of cognitive capability gaps and proposes a conceptual ACIA architecture and cognition-centric metrics, none of which are validated.

  8. SOS-LoRA: Static Orthogonal-Subspace Low-Rank Adaptation with Fixed Multi-Scale Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A LoRA update split into several fixed, differently-scaled low-rank experts with orthogonal input directions improves fine-tuning accuracy at the same parameter count.

  9. Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Forgetting-aware Pruning

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    FAPM prunes task vectors using a combined absolute and relative change magnitude criterion, reducing forgetting on general benchmarks to roughly a third of a percent while keeping downstream accuracy near the fine-tun...

  10. A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM hallucination types, causes, benchmarks, and mitigations, and restates the theorem that hallucination is inevitable for computable LLMs.

Pith tools