Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Using Large Language Model to Solve and Explain Physics Word Problems Approaching Human Level

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.08182 v2 pith:NCBN2BYM submitted 2023-09-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords problemswordphysicssolvegpt3approachingdemonstratesfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our work demonstrates that large language model (LLM) pre-trained on texts can not only solve pure math word problems, but also physics word problems, whose solution requires calculation and inference based on prior physical knowledge. We collect and annotate the first physics word problem dataset-PhysQA, which contains over 1000 junior high school physics word problems (covering Kinematics, Mass&Density, Mechanics, Heat, Electricity). Then we use OpenAI' s GPT3.5 to generate the answer of these problems and found that GPT3.5 could automatically solve 49.3% of the problems through zero-shot learning and 73.2% through few-shot learning. This result demonstrates that by using similar problems and their answers as prompt, LLM could solve elementary physics word problems approaching human level performance. In addition to solving problems, GPT3.5 can also summarize the knowledge or topics covered by the problems, provide relevant explanations, and generate new physics word problems based on the input. Our work is the first research to focus on the automatic solving, explanation, and generation of physics word problems across various types and scenarios, and we achieve an acceptable and state-of-the-art accuracy. This underscores the potential of LLMs for further applications in secondary education.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Logic-Guided Socially-aware Robot Navigation World Model

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NaviWM couples a spatial-temporal world model with a deductive chain-of-thought, formalizing social navigation rules as first-order logic, and reports improved success and lower violation rates in simulated crowded na...

  2. PhySense: Principle-Based Physics Reasoning Benchmarking for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 380 principle-based physics problems shows that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to apply symmetry, conservation, and dimensional-analysis shortcuts, achieving under 50 percent average accuracy with h...

  3. xInv: Explainable Optimization of Inverse Problems

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An explainability method that instruments differentiable optimizers to emit natural language events and uses a language model to synthesize human-readable explanations of inverse problem optimization.

  4. Use of a genetic algorithm to find solutions to introductory physics problems

    cs.NE 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A genetic algorithm that minimizes known-unknown mismatches can find step-by-step equation sequences for 1D kinematics problems, according to the abstract.

Pith tools