Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

HealthFC: Verifying Health Claims with Evidence-Based Medical Fact-Checking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.08503 v2 pith:U5O4SIBW submitted 2023-09-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords datasetclaimsevidencefact-checkingmedicalautomatedchallenginghealth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the digital age, seeking health advice on the Internet has become a common practice. At the same time, determining the trustworthiness of online medical content is increasingly challenging. Fact-checking has emerged as an approach to assess the veracity of factual claims using evidence from credible knowledge sources. To help advance automated Natural Language Processing (NLP) solutions for this task, in this paper we introduce a novel dataset HealthFC. It consists of 750 health-related claims in German and English, labeled for veracity by medical experts and backed with evidence from systematic reviews and clinical trials. We provide an analysis of the dataset, highlighting its characteristics and challenges. The dataset can be used for NLP tasks related to automated fact-checking, such as evidence retrieval, claim verification, or explanation generation. For testing purposes, we provide baseline systems based on different approaches, examine their performance, and discuss the findings. We show that the dataset is a challenging test bed with a high potential for future use.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating hallucinations in healthcare LLMs with granular fact-checking and domain-specific adaptation

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A deterministic, proposition-level fact-checker that compares clinical summaries against electronic health records via (entity, attribute, value, time) claims and hard-coded logical checks reports 0.8904 precision and...

Pith tools