Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.08859 v1 pith:RXC6SNDN submitted 2023-09-16 cs.LG

Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Large Language Models

classification cs.LG
keywords learningratefine-tuningllmstuninglanguagelargemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) represent the recent success of deep learning in achieving remarkable human-like predictive performance. It has become a mainstream strategy to leverage fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for various real-world applications due to the prohibitive expenses associated with LLM training. The learning rate is one of the most important hyperparameters in LLM fine-tuning with direct impacts on both fine-tuning efficiency and fine-tuned LLM quality. Existing learning rate policies are primarily designed for training traditional deep neural networks (DNNs), which may not work well for LLM fine-tuning. We reassess the research challenges and opportunities of learning rate tuning in the coming era of Large Language Models. This paper makes three original contributions. First, we revisit existing learning rate policies to analyze the critical challenges of learning rate tuning in the era of LLMs. Second, we present LRBench++ to benchmark learning rate policies and facilitate learning rate tuning for both traditional DNNs and LLMs. Third, our experimental analysis with LRBench++ demonstrates the key differences between LLM fine-tuning and traditional DNN training and validates our analysis.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimization Hyper-parameter Laws for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Opt-Laws predicts LLM final training loss from LR schedules via SDE-derived convergence and escape features, with 94% Top-2 hit rate on held-out schedules and F1=0.92 for divergence detection.

  2. TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...

  3. MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2023-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    Continued pretraining of Llama-2 on medical data yields MEDITRON-70B, which outperforms GPT-3.5 and Med-PaLM while approaching GPT-4 performance on medical benchmarks.

  4. Multi-Model Synthetic Training for Mission-Critical Small Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fine-tunes Qwen2.5-7B on 21,543 synthetic maritime Q&A pairs generated from 3.2B AIS records by GPT-4o and o3-mini, reaching 75% accuracy at 261x lower inference cost than larger models.