Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Pruning Large Language Models via Accuracy Predictor

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.09507 v2 pith:TSK77SPC submitted 2023-09-18 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelaccuracypredictorpruningapproachcapabilitiescertainlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models(LLMs) containing tens of billions of parameters (or even more) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various NLP tasks. However, substantial model size poses challenges to training, inference, and deployment so that it is necessary to compress the model. At present, most model compression for LLMs requires manual design of pruning features, which has problems such as complex optimization pipeline and difficulty in retaining the capabilities of certain parts of the model.Therefore, we propose a novel pruning approach: firstly, a training set of a certain number of architecture-accuracy pairs is established, and then a non-neural model is trained as an accuracy predictor. Using the accuracy predictor to further optimize the search space and search, the optimal model can be automatically selected. Experiments show that our proposed approach is effective and efficient. Compared with the baseline, the perplexity(PPL) on Wikitext2 and PTB dropped by 9.48% and 5,76% respectively, and the average accuracy of MMLU increased by 6.28%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAAP scores LLM structures with a weighted fusion of two importance measures, prunes the most volatile units, and recovers performance with grouped quantized low-rank fine-tuning.

  2. Deploying Foundation Model Powered Agent Services: A Survey

    cs.DC 2024-12 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    This survey proposes a layered framework (execution, resource, model, agent, application) for deploying foundation-model-powered agent services across edge-cloud environments, and reviews optimization techniques at ea...

Pith tools