REVIEW 1 cited by
Hyperbolic vs Euclidean Embeddings in Few-Shot Learning: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent research in representation learning has shown that hierarchical data lends itself to low-dimensional and highly informative representations in hyperbolic space. However, even if hyperbolic embeddings have gathered attention in image recognition, their optimization is prone to numerical hurdles. Further, it remains unclear which applications stand to benefit the most from the implicit bias imposed by hyperbolicity, when compared to traditional Euclidean features. In this paper, we focus on prototypical hyperbolic neural networks. In particular, the tendency of hyperbolic embeddings to converge to the boundary of the Poincar\'e ball in high dimensions and the effect this has on few-shot classification. We show that the best few-shot results are attained for hyperbolic embeddings at a common hyperbolic radius. In contrast to prior benchmark results, we demonstrate that better performance can be achieved by a fixed-radius encoder equipped with the Euclidean metric, regardless of the embedding dimension.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Similarity Gates Approve Reversals: A Validity Audit of Embedding-Cosine Thresholds in Agent Systems
Embedding-cosine thresholds used as meaning gates instead measure lexical overlap, so in the target cases of reversal-versus-paraphrase the gates fire backwards; a matched-pair audit reveals the regime.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.