REVIEW 2 cited by
"With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility!": Student and Instructor Perspectives on the influence of LLMs on Undergraduate Engineering Education
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The rise in popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs) has prompted discussions in academic circles, with students exploring LLM-based tools for coursework inquiries and instructors exploring them for teaching and research. Even though a lot of work is underway to create LLM-based tools tailored for students and instructors, there is a lack of comprehensive user studies that capture the perspectives of students and instructors regarding LLMs. This paper addresses this gap by conducting surveys and interviews within undergraduate engineering universities in India. Using 1306 survey responses among students, 112 student interviews, and 27 instructor interviews around the academic usage of ChatGPT (a popular LLM), this paper offers insights into the current usage patterns, perceived benefits, threats, and challenges, as well as recommendations for enhancing the adoption of LLMs among students and instructors. These insights are further utilized to discuss the practical implications of LLMs in undergraduate engineering education and beyond.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Insights from the Frontline: GenAI Utilization Among Software Engineering Students
Students found generative AI helpful for incremental learning and initial implementation, but challenging for first-time concept learning and advanced implementation, with causes traced to intrinsic AI faults and gaps.
-
Howzat? Appealing to Expert Judgement for Evaluating Human and AI Next-Step Hints for Novice Programmers
With a carefully designed multi-stage prompt, GPT-4 generated next-step hints that Java educators ranked higher than hints written by experienced human educators.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.