Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PlanFitting: Personalized Exercise Planning with Large Language Model-driven Conversational Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.12555 v2 pith:UZNYFZ7I submitted 2023-09-22 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CL
keywords exerciseplanspersonalizedplanfittingusersconversationalactionableagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Creating personalized and actionable exercise plans often requires iteration with experts, which can be costly and inaccessible to many individuals. This work explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in addressing these challenges. We present PlanFitting, an LLM-driven conversational agent that assists users in creating and refining personalized weekly exercise plans. By engaging users in free-form conversations, PlanFitting helps elicit users' goals, availabilities, and potential obstacles, and enables individuals to generate personalized exercise plans aligned with established exercise guidelines. Our study -- involving a user study, intrinsic evaluation, and expert evaluation -- demonstrated PlanFitting's ability to guide users to create tailored, actionable, and evidence-based plans. We discuss future design opportunities for LLM-driven conversational agents to create plans that better comply with exercise principles and accommodate personal constraints.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Systematic Analysis of LLM Contributions to Planning: Solver, Verifier, Heuristic

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across three planning domains, LLMs perform better as comparative rankers of intermediate plans than as direct solvers or verifiers, and one-shot heuristic guidance improves ranking.

Pith tools