RECORD
On improved estimation of the larger location parameter
Statistics Theory · Submitted 25 Sep 2023
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We prove that a natural estimator (analogue of the BLEE of unordered location parameters) is inadmissible, under certain conditions on underlying densities, and propose a dominating estimator.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This paper investigates the problem of estimating the larger location parameter of two general location families from a decision-theoretic perspective. In this estimation problem, we use the criteria of minimizing the risk function and the Pitman closeness under a general bowl-shaped loss function. Inadmissibility of a general location and equivariant estimators is provided. We prove that a natural estimator (analogue of the BLEE of unordered location parameters) is inadmissible, under certain conditions on underlying densities, and propose a dominating estimator. We also derive a class of improved estimators using the Kubokawa's IERD approach and observe that the boundary estimator of this class is the Brewster-Zidek type estimator. Additionally, under the generalized Pitman criterion, we show that the natural estimator is inadmissible and obtain improved estimators. The results are implemented for different loss functions, and explicit expressions for the dominating estimators are provided. We explore the applications of these results to for exponential and normal distribution under specified loss functions. A simulation is also conducted to compare the risk performance of the proposed estimators. Finally, we present a real-life data analysis to illustrate the practical applications of the paper's findings.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | This paper investigates the problem of estimating the larger location parameter of two general location families from a decision-theoretic perspective. | contribution 0.56 | 0.86 | 0.05 | asserted 0.93 |
| s1 | In this estimation problem, we use the criteria of minimizing the risk function and the Pitman closeness under a general bowl-shaped loss function. | method 0.94 | 0.70 | 0.04 | asserted 0.97 |
| s2 | Inadmissibility of a general location and equivariant estimators is provided. | result 0.98 | 0.87 | 0.13 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We prove that a natural estimator (analogue of the BLEE of unordered location parameters) is inadmissible, under certain conditions on underlying densities, and propose a dominating estimator. | result 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.48 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We also derive a class of improved estimators using the Kubokawa's IERD approach and observe that the boundary estimator of this class is the Brewster-Zidek type estimator. | contribution 0.60 | 0.96 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Additionally, under the generalized Pitman criterion, we show that the natural estimator is inadmissible and obtain improved estimators. | result 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.18 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | The results are implemented for different loss functions, and explicit expressions for the dominating estimators are provided. | contribution 0.59 | 0.94 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s7 | We explore the applications of these results to for exponential and normal distribution under specified loss functions. | contribution 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.05 | asserted 0.93 |
| s8 | A simulation is also conducted to compare the risk performance of the proposed estimators. | method 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s9 | Finally, we present a real-life data analysis to illustrate the practical applications of the paper's findings. | contribution 0.58 | 0.95 | 0.06 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
This paper investigates the problem of estimating the larger location parameter of two general location families from a decision-theoretic perspective. In this estimation problem, we use the criteria of minimizing the risk function and the Pitman closeness under a general bowl-shaped loss function. Inadmissibility of a general location and equivariant estimators is provided. We prove that a natural estimator (analogue of the BLEE of unordered location parameters) is inadmissible, under certain conditions on underlying densities, and propose a dominating estimator. We also derive a class of improved estimators using the Kubokawa's IERD approach and observe that the boundary estimator of this class is the Brewster-Zidek type estimator. Additionally, under the generalized Pitman criterion, we show that the natural estimator is inadmissible and obtain improved estimators. The results are implemented for different loss functions, and explicit expressions for the dominating estimators are provided. We explore the applications of these results to for exponential and normal distribution under specified loss functions. A simulation is also conducted to compare the risk performance of the proposed estimators. Finally, we present a real-life data analysis to illustrate the practical applications of the paper's findings.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
[ref] investigated the problem of estimating the larger location parameter within two general location families, employing criteria that involve minimizing the risk function and achieving Pitman closeness, all within the context of a general bowl-shaped loss function.
Estimating location parameters of two exponential distributions with ordered scale parameters · Introduction · 0.82
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.