Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantum walk mixing is faster than classical on periodic lattices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.16352 v1 pith:QCKYVP55 submitted 2023-09-28 quant-ph

Quantum walk mixing is faster than classical on periodic lattices

classification quant-ph
keywords quantummixingtimeepsilontimeswalksclassicalfaster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This work focuses on the quantum mixing time, which is crucial for efficient quantum sampling and algorithm performance. We extend Richter's previous analysis of continuous time quantum walks on the periodic lattice $\mathbb{Z}_{n_1}\times \mathbb{Z}_{n_2}\times \dots \times \mathbb{Z}_{n_d}$, allowing for non-identical dimensions $n_i$. We present two quantum walks that achieve faster mixing compared to classical random walks. The first is a coordinate-wise quantum walk with a mixing time of $O\left(\left(\sum{i=1}^{d} n_i \right) \log{(d/\epsilon)}\right)$ and $O(d \log(d/\epsilon))$ measurements. The second is a continuous-time quantum walk with $O(\log(1/\epsilon))$ measurements, conjectured to have a mixing time of $O\left(\sum_{i=1}^d n_i(\log(n_1))^2 \log(1/\epsilon)\right)$. Our results demonstrate a quadratic speedup over classical mixing times on the generalized periodic lattice. We provide analytical evidence and numerical simulations supporting the conjectured faster mixing time. The ultimate goal is to prove the general conjecture for quantum walks on regular graphs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.