Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Bellman operator for convergence of $Q$-learning with linear function approximation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.16819 v1 pith:63REFNXY submitted 2023-09-28 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords operatormulti-bellmanapproximationfunctionlearninglinearalgorithmbellman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study the convergence of $Q$-learning with linear function approximation. Our key contribution is the introduction of a novel multi-Bellman operator that extends the traditional Bellman operator. By exploring the properties of this operator, we identify conditions under which the projected multi-Bellman operator becomes contractive, providing improved fixed-point guarantees compared to the Bellman operator. To leverage these insights, we propose the multi $Q$-learning algorithm with linear function approximation. We demonstrate that this algorithm converges to the fixed-point of the projected multi-Bellman operator, yielding solutions of arbitrary accuracy. Finally, we validate our approach by applying it to well-known environments, showcasing the effectiveness and applicability of our findings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond expected value: geometric mean optimization for long-term policy performance in reinforcement learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a modified geometric mean regularizer for multi-step Q-learning and claims it captures time-average growth, but the key theoretical and empirical supports are weak.

Pith tools