Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Discrete-Choice Model with Generalized Additive Utility Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.16970 v2 pith:5XKAEO7S submitted 2023-09-29 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsutilityadditivediscrete-choicegeneralizedmnlsaccuracyasu-dnn
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Discrete-choice models are a powerful framework for analyzing decision-making behavior to provide valuable insights for policymakers and businesses. Multinomial logit models (MNLs) with linear utility functions have been used in practice because they are ease to use and interpretable. Recently, MNLs with neural networks (e.g., ASU-DNN) have been developed, and they have achieved higher prediction accuracy in behavior choice than classical MNLs. However, these models lack interpretability owing to complex structures. We developed utility functions with a novel neural-network architecture based on generalized additive models, named generalized additive utility network ( GAUNet), for discrete-choice models. We evaluated the performance of the MNL with GAUNet using the trip survey data collected in Tokyo. Our models were comparable to ASU-DNN in accuracy and exhibited improved interpretability compared to previous models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An analysis of machine learning approaches for enhancing decision-making in complex discrete choice tasks

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A simulation benchmark claims semi- and non-parametric models outperform parametric models at recovering discrete choice rules, but flawed data generation and a misapplied BIC weaken the claim.

Pith tools