REVIEW 1 cited by
Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) methods have mostly been built to investigate and shed light on single machine learning models and are not designed to capture and explain differences between multiple models effectively. This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models, which is crucial for model selection, monitoring and lifecycle management in real-world applications. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations describing the differences between two binary classifiers. To assess the effectiveness of DeltaXplainer, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, covering various model comparison scenarios involving different types of concept drift.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Queries, Representation & Detection: The Next 100 Model Fingerprinting Schemes
A simple baseline that flags a suspect model whenever it repeats a victim model's mistakes performs as well as or better than complex state-of-the-art model fingerprints on existing benchmarks, exposing those benchmar...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.