Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AI-Aristotle: A Physics-Informed framework for Systems Biology Gray-Box Identification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.01433 v1 pith:CWFKCSEY submitted 2023-09-29 q-bio.QM cs.AIcs.LG

classification q-bio.QMcs.AIcs.LG
keywords identificationsystemsai-aristotlegray-boxbiologydataframeworkphysics-informed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Discovering mathematical equations that govern physical and biological systems from observed data is a fundamental challenge in scientific research. We present a new physics-informed framework for parameter estimation and missing physics identification (gray-box) in the field of Systems Biology. The proposed framework -- named AI-Aristotle -- combines eXtreme Theory of Functional Connections (X-TFC) domain-decomposition and Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) with symbolic regression (SR) techniques for parameter discovery and gray-box identification. We test the accuracy, speed, flexibility and robustness of AI-Aristotle based on two benchmark problems in Systems Biology: a pharmacokinetics drug absorption model, and an ultradian endocrine model for glucose-insulin interactions. We compare the two machine learning methods (X-TFC and PINNs), and moreover, we employ two different symbolic regression techniques to cross-verify our results. While the current work focuses on the performance of AI-Aristotle based on synthetic data, it can equally handle noisy experimental data and can even be used for black-box identification in just a few minutes on a laptop. More broadly, our work provides insights into the accuracy, cost, scalability, and robustness of integrating neural networks with symbolic regressors, offering a comprehensive guide for researchers tackling gray-box identification challenges in complex dynamical systems in biomedicine and beyond.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Two Hidden Layers Still Enough for the Physics-Informed Neural Networks?

    math.NA 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A collection of deterministic initialization, loss weighting, data-driven initialization, and gradient-free training methods for shallow physics-informed neural networks, tested on ODEs and PDEs.

  2. Data-driven discovery of dynamical models in biology

    q-bio.QM 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review benchmarking regression, network, and decomposition methods on the Oregonator model under the Koopman operator framework, with illustrative experiments on simulated data.

  3. About rectified sigmoid function for enhancing the accuracy of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    math.NA 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Rectified sigmoid (hard sigmoid) activation is reported to cut PINN solution errors by about an order of magnitude on two ODE benchmarks, but the result may be an interpolation artifact because the paper never disclos...

Pith tools