REVIEW 7 cited by
AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multi-task learning (MTL) aims to empower a model to tackle multiple tasks simultaneously. A recent development known as task arithmetic has revealed that several models, each fine-tuned for distinct tasks, can be directly merged into a single model to execute MTL without necessitating a retraining process using the initial training data. Nevertheless, this direct addition of models often leads to a significant deterioration in the overall performance of the merged model. This decline occurs due to potential conflicts and intricate correlations among the multiple tasks. Consequently, the challenge emerges of how to merge pre-trained models more effectively without using their original training data. This paper introduces an innovative technique called Adaptive Model Merging (AdaMerging). This approach aims to autonomously learn the coefficients for model merging, either in a task-wise or layer-wise manner, without relying on the original training data. Specifically, our AdaMerging method operates as an automatic, unsupervised task arithmetic scheme. It leverages entropy minimization on unlabeled test samples from the multi-task setup as a surrogate objective function to iteratively refine the merging coefficients of the multiple models. Our experimental findings across eight tasks demonstrate the efficacy of the AdaMerging scheme we put forth. Compared to the current state-of-the-art task arithmetic merging scheme, AdaMerging showcases a remarkable 11\% improvement in performance. Notably, AdaMerging also exhibits superior generalization capabilities when applied to unseen downstream tasks. Furthermore, it displays a significantly enhanced robustness to data distribution shifts that may occur during the testing phase.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
DivMerge: A divergence-based model merging method for multi-tasking
DivMerge learns task-arithmetic merging weights by minimizing Jensen-Shannon divergence between each specialist model and the merged model, improving multi-task performance and scalability.
-
Interaction-Merged Motion Planning: Effectively Leveraging Diverse Motion Datasets for Robust Planning
A two-step model-merging method transfers interaction knowledge from multiple motion datasets to a target domain, outperforming ensembling and domain adaptation at the same inference cost.
-
Graft: Integrating the Domain Knowledge via Efficient Parameter Synergy for MLLMs
Graft merges two domain-specialized multimodal models by combining channel-wise gating, entropy-based global weighting, and an activation compatibility score to improve fusion without retraining.
-
Harmonizing and Merging Source Models for CLIP-based Domain Generalization
HAM trains per-domain CLIP encoders, enriches them with confident cross-domain samples, aligns their update directions, and merges them with redundancy trimming, reaching 79.0% average accuracy on five DG benchmarks w...
-
PSO-Merging: Merging Models Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
PSO-Merging applies particle swarm optimization over model weight space, seeded with original and sparsified experts, to build multitask models that outperform existing merging baselines on several language benchmarks.
-
Exploring Sparse Adapters for Scalable Merging of Parameter Efficient Experts
Sparse adapters trained with max connection sensitivity outperform LoRA and full fine-tuning both alone and after merging 20 task experts, but still lag multitask training on unseen tasks.
-
StatsMerging: Statistics-Guided Model Merging via Task-Specific Teacher Distillation
StatsMerging predicts per-layer merging coefficients from weight statistics and teacher pseudo-labels, achieving 94.5% average accuracy across eight vision tasks, 5.1 points above WEMoE.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.