Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep reinforcement learning for machine scheduling: Methodology, the state-of-the-art, and future directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.03195 v1 pith:BTRM4EWU submitted 2023-10-04 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NE
keywords schedulingmachinedrl-basedapproacheslearningreinforcementalgorithmsdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine scheduling aims to optimize job assignments to machines while adhering to manufacturing rules and job specifications. This optimization leads to reduced operational costs, improved customer demand fulfillment, and enhanced production efficiency. However, machine scheduling remains a challenging combinatorial problem due to its NP-hard nature. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), a key component of artificial general intelligence, has shown promise in various domains like gaming and robotics. Researchers have explored applying DRL to machine scheduling problems since 1995. This paper offers a comprehensive review and comparison of DRL-based approaches, highlighting their methodology, applications, advantages, and limitations. It categorizes these approaches based on computational components: conventional neural networks, encoder-decoder architectures, graph neural networks, and metaheuristic algorithms. Our review concludes that DRL-based methods outperform exact solvers, heuristics, and tabular reinforcement learning algorithms in terms of computation speed and generating near-global optimal solutions. These DRL-based approaches have been successfully applied to static and dynamic scheduling across diverse machine environments and job characteristics. However, DRL-based schedulers face limitations in handling complex operational constraints, configurable multi-objective optimization, generalization, scalability, interpretability, and robustness. Addressing these challenges will be a crucial focus for future research in this field. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers to assess the current state of DRL-based machine scheduling and identify research gaps. It also aids experts and practitioners in selecting the appropriate DRL approach for production scheduling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Innovative Data-Driven and Adaptive Reinforcement Learning Approach for Context-Aware Prescriptive Process Monitoring

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    FORLAPS combines offline Q-learning with process-aware augmentation and fine-tuning, claiming 31% resource time savings and 23% process time reduction in prescriptive process monitoring.

Pith tools