Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Improving the Reliability of Large Language Models by Leveraging Uncertainty-Aware In-Context Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.04782 v1 pith:FDC2DU4J submitted 2023-10-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modeluncertaintyknowledgeresponsewhencorrectframeworkin-context
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, large-scale language models (LLMs) have gained attention for their impressive text generation capabilities. However, these models often face the challenge of "hallucination," which undermines their reliability. In this study, we introduce an uncertainty-aware in-context learning framework to empower the model to enhance or reject its output in response to uncertainty. Human-defined methods for estimating uncertainty typically assume that "uncertainty is lower when the model's response is correct compared to when it is incorrect." However, setting a precise threshold to distinguish correctness is challenging. Therefore, we introduce uncertainty information as an intermediary variable that implicitly influences the model's behavior. Our innovative uncertainty-aware in-context learning framework involves fine-tuning the LLM using a calibration dataset. Our aim is to improve the model's responses by filtering out answers with high uncertainty while considering the model's knowledge limitations. We evaluate the model's knowledge by examining multiple responses to the same question for the presence of a correct answer. When the model lacks relevant knowledge, the response should indicate that the question cannot be answered. Conversely, when the model has relevant knowledge, the response should provide the correct answer. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of our framework, leading to two key findings. First, the logit output values of the LLM partly reflect inherent uncertainty. Second, our model autonomously recognizes uncertainty, resulting in improved responses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CrossHallu: Do Hallucination Signals Generalize Across Languages and Domains in Large Language Model's Internals?

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hallucination signals from LLM internals transfer across English–Arabic and Arabic domains for most models, depending on class separability and feature-space language alignment.

  2. UAlign: Leveraging Uncertainty Estimations for Factuality Alignment on Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UAlign improves LLM factuality alignment by adding predicted confidence and semantic entropy as input features to prompts and the reward model, helping the model answer known questions and refuse unknown ones.

  3. VideoICL: Confidence-based Iterative In-context Learning for Out-of-Distribution Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free, confidence-gated iterative in-context learning framework substantially improves out-of-distribution video understanding in QA, classification, and captioning.

  4. A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review that organizes LLM uncertainty quantification into token-level, self-verbalized, semantic-similarity, and mechanistic interpretability categories.

  5. Loki's Dance of Illusions: A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM hallucination research that formalizes hallucination types and argues, via incompleteness and undecidability arguments, that hallucinations cannot be fully eliminated.

Pith tools