Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tight Certified Robustness via Min-Max Representations of ReLU Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.04916 v1 pith:NEUTBJDF submitted 2023-10-07 math.OC cs.LG

classification math.OCcs.LG
keywords networksneuralproblemrobustnesscontrolconvexdiscretedistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The reliable deployment of neural networks in control systems requires rigorous robustness guarantees. In this paper, we obtain tight robustness certificates over convex attack sets for min-max representations of ReLU neural networks by developing a convex reformulation of the nonconvex certification problem. This is done by "lifting" the problem to an infinite-dimensional optimization over probability measures, leveraging recent results in distributionally robust optimization to solve for an optimal discrete distribution, and proving that solutions of the original nonconvex problem are generated by the discrete distribution under mild boundedness, nonredundancy, and Slater conditions. As a consequence, optimal (worst-case) attacks against the model may be solved for exactly. This contrasts prior state-of-the-art that either requires expensive branch-and-bound schemes or loose relaxation techniques. Experiments on robust control and MNIST image classification examples highlight the benefits of our approach.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Control Synthesis with Reinforcement Learning: A Modeling Perspective

    eess.SY 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A simplified linear training model yields an RL cart-pole controller that fails in physical deployment, while a high-fidelity nonlinear model yields a deployable, disturbance-robust controller.

Pith tools