REVIEW 2 cited by
Self-Convinced Prompting: Few-Shot Question Answering with Repeated Introspection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and PaLM have demonstrated remarkable performance in various language understanding and generation tasks, their capabilities in complex reasoning and intricate knowledge utilization still fall short of human-level proficiency. Recent studies have established the effectiveness of prompts in steering LLMs towards generating desired outputs. Building on these insights, we introduce a novel framework that harnesses the potential of large-scale pre-trained language models, to iteratively enhance performance of the LLMs. Our framework incorporates three components: \textit{Normal CoT}, a \textit{Convincer}, and an \textit{Answerer}. It processes the output of a typical few-shot chain-of-thought prompt, assesses the correctness of the response, scrutinizes the answer, refines the reasoning, and ultimately produces a new solution. Experimental results on the 7 datasets of miscellaneous problems validate the efficacy of the Self-Convince framework, achieving substantial improvements compared to the baselines. This study contributes to the burgeoning body of research focused on integrating pre-trained language models with tailored prompts and iterative refinement processes to augment their performance in complex tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Leveraging LLMs for Formal Software Requirements -- Challenges and Prospects
LLM-based formalisation of software requirements is promising but faces five persistent challenges; the proposed VERIFAI framework plans to address them with human-in-the-loop and tool-neutral pipelines.
-
A Short Survey on Formalising Software Requirements using Large Language Models
A survey summarizing 35 papers on using LLMs to formalize software requirements, but it contains no new experimental results and its classification tables have errors.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.