REVIEW 3 cited by
Watt For What: Rethinking Deep Learning's Energy-Performance Relationship
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning models have revolutionized various fields, from image recognition to natural language processing, by achieving unprecedented levels of accuracy. However, their increasing energy consumption has raised concerns about their environmental impact, disadvantaging smaller entities in research and exacerbating global energy consumption. In this paper, we explore the trade-off between model accuracy and electricity consumption, proposing a metric that penalizes large consumption of electricity. We conduct a comprehensive study on the electricity consumption of various deep learning models across different GPUs, presenting a detailed analysis of their accuracy-efficiency trade-offs. By evaluating accuracy per unit of electricity consumed, we demonstrate how smaller, more energy-efficient models can significantly expedite research while mitigating environmental concerns. Our results highlight the potential for a more sustainable approach to deep learning, emphasizing the importance of optimizing models for efficiency. This research also contributes to a more equitable research landscape, where smaller entities can compete effectively with larger counterparts. This advocates for the adoption of efficient deep learning practices to reduce electricity consumption, safeguarding the environment for future generations whilst also helping ensure a fairer competitive landscape.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts--Extended Version
A new benchmark of 15 small language models across 23 datasets and 11 metrics shows clear accuracy-versus-energy trade-offs, with no single model dominating.
-
Performance is not All You Need: Sustainability Considerations for Algorithms
The paper introduces FMS and ASC, composite sustainability scores that fuse accuracy and energy consumption, and evaluates them on multiple vision tasks.
- The Hidden Cost of an Image: Quantifying the Energy Consumption of AI Image Generation
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.