Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mitigating stereotypical biases in text to image generative systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.06904 v1 pith:QUGDRE72 submitted 2023-10-10 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords perceivedskintextbiasesgroupsmodelspeopleprompts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

State-of-the-art generative text-to-image models are known to exhibit social biases and over-represent certain groups like people of perceived lighter skin tones and men in their outcomes. In this work, we propose a method to mitigate such biases and ensure that the outcomes are fair across different groups of people. We do this by finetuning text-to-image models on synthetic data that varies in perceived skin tones and genders constructed from diverse text prompts. These text prompts are constructed from multiplicative combinations of ethnicities, genders, professions, age groups, and so on, resulting in diverse synthetic data. Our diversity finetuned (DFT) model improves the group fairness metric by 150% for perceived skin tone and 97.7% for perceived gender. Compared to baselines, DFT models generate more people with perceived darker skin tone and more women. To foster open research, we will release all text prompts and code to generate training images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do Existing Testing Tools Really Uncover Gender Bias in Text-to-Image Models?

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Standard gender-bias detectors for text-to-image models deviate substantially from human-annotated bias, and a face-filtering plus CLIP pipeline measures bias more accurately.

  2. Understanding and evaluating computer vision models through the lens of counterfactuals

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Counterfactual-based methods for concept attribution in classifiers and for dynamic bias evaluation and mitigation in text-to-image models.

  3. Mitigate One, Skew Another? Tackling Intersectional Biases in Text-to-Image Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BiasConnect predicts how mitigating bias on one axis shifts bias on another axis in text-to-image models, and InterMit uses that to guide efficient multi-axis bias mitigation.

Pith tools