REVIEW 1 cited by
Lipschitz Interpolation: Non-parametric Convergence under Bounded Stochastic Noise
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper examines the asymptotic convergence properties of Lipschitz interpolation methods within the context of bounded stochastic noise. In the first part of the paper, we establish probabilistic consistency guarantees of the classical approach in a general setting and derive upper bounds on the uniform convergence rates. These bounds align with well-established optimal rates of non-parametric regression obtained in related settings and provide new precise upper bounds on the non-parametric regression problem under bounded noise assumptions. Practically, they can serve as a theoretical tool for comparing Lipschitz interpolation to alternative non-parametric regression methods, providing a condition on the behaviour of the noise at the boundary of its support which indicates when Lipschitz interpolation should be expected to asymptotically outperform or underperform other approaches. In the second part, we expand upon these results to include asymptotic guarantees for online learning of dynamics in discrete-time stochastic systems and illustrate their utility in deriving closed-loop stability guarantees of a simple controller. We also explore applications where the main assumption of prior knowledge of the Lipschitz constant is removed by adopting the LACKI framework (Calliess et al. (2020)) and deriving general asymptotic consistency.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
An evaluation of LLMs for generating movie reviews: GPT-4o, Gemini-2.0 and DeepSeek-V3
LLMs can produce fluent movie reviews that readers often mistake for human-written ones, but the models differ in emotional balance and depth.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.