Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Harvesting correlations from vacuum quantum fields in the presence of a reflecting boundary

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.07164 v2 pith:RTQPMQKU submitted 2023-10-11 quant-ph hep-th

classification quant-phhep-th
keywords harvestingboundarycorrelationsdetectorsentanglementalignmentsinformationmutual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore correlations harvesting by two static detectors locally interacting with vacuum massless scalar fields in the presence of an infinite perfectly reflecting boundary. We study the phenomena of mutual information harvesting and entanglement harvesting for two detector-boundary alignments, i.e., parallel-to-boundary and vertical-to-boundary alignments. Our results show that the presence of the boundary generally inhibits mutual information harvesting relative to that in flat spacetime without any boundaries. In contrast, the boundary may play a doubled-edged role in entanglement harvesting, i.e., inhibiting entanglement harvesting in the near zone of the boundary while assisting it in the far zone of the boundary. Moreover, there exists an optimal detector energy gap difference between two nonidentical detectors that makes such detectors advantageous in correlations harvesting as long as the interdetector separation is large enough. The value of the optimal detector energy gap difference depends on both the interdetector separation and the detector-to-boundary distance. A comparison of the correlations harvesting in two different alignments shows that although correlations harvesting share qualitatively the same properties, they also display quantitative differences in that the detectors in vertical-to-boundary alignment always harvest comparatively more mutual information than the parallel-to-boundary ones, while they harvest comparatively more entanglement only near the boundary.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Privacy-Preserving Driver Drowsiness Detection with Spatial Self-Attention and Federated Learning

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Entanglement harvesting from a mass-superposed BTZ black hole is enhanced by interference, while mutual information shows a distance-dependent crossover relative to a single spacetime.

Pith tools