REVIEW 3 cited by
Constraining the Graviton Mass with the NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The recently detected stochastic signal by several pulsar timing array collaborations, offers an opportunity to scrutinize the fundamental properties of gravity, including the potential mass of the graviton. In this study, we analyze the NANOGrav 15-year data set to search for a stochastic gravitational wave background with modified Hellings-Downs correlations predicted by massive gravity. While the Bayesian analysis comparing the massive gravity to massless gravity within the effective searchable mass range of $m_g\in [3\times 10^{-25}, 8 \times 10^{-24}]\,\rm{eV}/c^2$ does not yield an explicit upper bound as all the Bayes factors are smaller than $3$, the combined consideration of the minimum frequency inherent in a massive gravity and the observed spectrum leads to an upper limit of $m_g<8.2\times 10^{-24}\,\rm{eV}/c^2$.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Probing Graviton Mass with MeerKAT PTA and SKA--PTA Forecasts
MPTA 4.5-year data imply a 90% upper bound of mg < 2.1 × 10−23 eV/c2, consistent with massless gravitons; SKA-PTA could reach ~10−25 eV/c2.
-
Do Pulsar Timing Datasets Favor Massive Gravity?
A one-parameter massive-gravity correlation curve gives lower chi-square than the Hellings-Downs curve for current pulsar-timing data, but the parameter is fitted to the data, so the result is not a prediction.
-
Gravitational Waves beyond the Linear Approximation and Gravitational Wave Reflection
A claimed beyond-linear derivation of gravitational wave reflection by black holes and material interfaces rests on an incorrect Ricci-tensor variation formula.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.