Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Recent Survey of Heterogeneous Transfer Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.08459 v3 pith:6OI3TKYW submitted 2023-10-12 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningdomainstransfermethodsapplicationsareasfeaturefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The application of transfer learning, leveraging knowledge from source domains to enhance model performance in a target domain, has significantly grown, supporting diverse real-world applications. Its success often relies on shared knowledge between domains, typically required in these methodologies. Commonly, methods assume identical feature and label spaces in both domains, known as homogeneous transfer learning. However, this is often impractical as source and target domains usually differ in these spaces, making precise data matching challenging and costly. Consequently, heterogeneous transfer learning (HTL), which addresses these disparities, has become a vital strategy in various tasks. In this paper, we offer an extensive review of over 60 HTL methods, covering both data-based and model-based approaches. We describe the key assumptions and algorithms of these methods and systematically categorize them into instance-based, feature representation-based, parameter regularization, and parameter tuning techniques. Additionally, we explore applications in natural language processing, computer vision, multimodal learning, and biomedicine, aiming to deepen understanding and stimulate further research in these areas. Our paper includes recent advancements in HTL, such as the introduction of transformer-based models and multimodal learning techniques, ensuring the review captures the latest developments in the field. We identify key limitations in current HTL studies and offer systematic guidance for future research, highlighting areas needing further exploration and suggesting potential directions for advancing the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sufficiency-principled Transfer Learning via Model Averaging

    stat.ME 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sufficiency-penalized model averaging transfer learning method that adaptively selects informative domains, with convergence rates, optimality, and asymptotic normality.

  2. Continual Learning with Support Boundary Experience Blending

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Experience Blending with Support Boundary Data improves continual learning accuracy by 6-14% over strong replay baselines on four image benchmarks.

Pith tools