Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09241 v1 pith:AD2S24GY submitted 2023-10-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelslegalprecedentsjudgmentcasedomainpredictioncollaboration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI, i.e., predicting the judgment of the case in terms of case fact description. Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems. Thus, it is worthwhile to explore the utilization of precedents in the LJP. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task. These can be broken down into two categories: large language models (LLMs) and domain-specific models. LLMs are capable of interpreting and generating complex natural language, while domain models are efficient in learning task-specific information. In this paper, we propose the precedent-enhanced LJP framework (PLJP), a system that leverages the strength of both LLM and domain models in the context of precedents. Specifically, the domain models are designed to provide candidate labels and find the proper precedents efficiently, and the large models will make the final prediction with an in-context precedents comprehension. Experiments on the real-world dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our PLJP. Moreover, our work shows a promising direction for LLM and domain-model collaboration that can be generalized to other vertical domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LegalChainReasoner: A Legal Chain-guided Framework for Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A legal-chain-guided framework generates criminal judicial opinions, jointly producing legal reasoning and sentencing predictions, and outperforms baselines on two Chinese case datasets.

  2. ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ASP2LJ combines synthetic case generation with adversarial self-play for lawyer agents, improving legal judgment prediction on a Chinese benchmark and on a new rare-case dataset.

Pith tools