Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A GPU-based Distributed Algorithm for Linearized Optimal Power Flow in Distribution Systems

Optimization and Control · Submitted 13 Oct 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results affirm the scalability and superior speed of our GPU-based approach compared to the CPU-based counterpart.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2310.09410 (version 1)
Pith IDXUJICGCX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGeunyeong Byeon, Kibaek Kim, Minseok Ryu. "A GPU-based Distributed Algorithm for Linearized Optimal Power Flow in Distribution Systems." arXiv:2310.09410 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/XUJICGCX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,476 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.81 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.43 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We propose a GPU-based distributed optimization algorithm, aimed at controlling optimal power flow in multi-phase and unbalanced distribution systems. Typically, conventional distributed optimization algorithms employed in such scenarios rely on parallel execution with multiple CPUs. However, this often leads to significant computation time primarily due to the need for optimization solvers to solve subproblems for every iteration of the algorithms. To address this computational challenge, we propose a distributed optimization algorithm that eliminates solver dependencies and harnesses GPU acceleration. The central idea involves decomposing networks to yield subproblems with closed-form solutions based on matrix operations that GPU can efficiently handle. We demonstrate the computational performance of our approach through numerical experiments on four IEEE test instances ranging from 13 to 8500 buses. Our results affirm the scalability and superior speed of our GPU-based approach compared to the CPU-based counterpart.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We propose a GPU-based distributed optimization algorithm, aimed at controlling optimal power flow in multi-phase and unbalanced distribution systems. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.09 asserted 0.99
s1 Typically, conventional distributed optimization algorithms employed in such scenarios rely on parallel execution with multiple CPUs. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.95
s2 However, this often leads to significant computation time primarily due to the need for optimization solvers to solve subproblems for every iteration of the algorithms. background 0.75 0.13 0.03 asserted 0.82
s3 To address this computational challenge, we propose a distributed optimization algorithm that eliminates solver dependencies and harnesses GPU acceleration. contribution 0.93 0.80 0.11 asserted 0.99
s4 The central idea involves decomposing networks to yield subproblems with closed-form solutions based on matrix operations that GPU can efficiently handle. method 0.97 0.71 0.07 asserted 1.00
s5 We demonstrate the computational performance of our approach through numerical experiments on four IEEE test instances ranging from 13 to 8500 buses. method 0.78 0.97 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 Our results affirm the scalability and superior speed of our GPU-based approach compared to the CPU-based counterpart. result 0.61 0.96 0.82 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We propose a GPU-based distributed optimization algorithm, aimed at controlling optimal power flow in multi-phase and unbalanced distribution systems. Typically, conventional distributed optimization algorithms employed in such scenarios rely on parallel execution with multiple CPUs. However, this often leads to significant computation time primarily due to the need for optimization solvers to solve subproblems for every iteration of the algorithms. To address this computational challenge, we propose a distributed optimization algorithm that eliminates solver dependencies and harnesses GPU acceleration. The central idea involves decomposing networks to yield subproblems with closed-form solutions based on matrix operations that GPU can efficiently handle. We demonstrate the computational performance of our approach through numerical experiments on four IEEE test instances ranging from 13 to 8500 buses. Our results affirm the scalability and superior speed of our GPU-based approach compared to the CPU-based counterpart.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.