Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Utilising a Large Language Model to Annotate Subject Metadata: A Case Study in an Australian National Research Data Catalogue

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.11318 v1 pith:PM3PHN42 submitted 2023-10-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords metadatasubjectannotationdatadatasetsin-contextlanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In support of open and reproducible research, there has been a rapidly increasing number of datasets made available for research. As the availability of datasets increases, it becomes more important to have quality metadata for discovering and reusing them. Yet, it is a common issue that datasets often lack quality metadata due to limited resources for data curation. Meanwhile, technologies such as artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs) are progressing rapidly. Recently, systems based on these technologies, such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated promising capabilities for certain data curation tasks. This paper proposes to leverage LLMs for cost-effective annotation of subject metadata through the LLM-based in-context learning. Our method employs GPT-3.5 with prompts designed for annotating subject metadata, demonstrating promising performance in automatic metadata annotation. However, models based on in-context learning cannot acquire discipline-specific rules, resulting in lower performance in several categories. This limitation arises from the limited contextual information available for subject inference. To the best of our knowledge, we are introducing, for the first time, an in-context learning method that harnesses large language models for automated subject metadata annotation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Hybrid Framework for Subject Analysis: Integrating Embedding-Based Regression Models with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using an ML-predicted label count to constrain LLM generation and post-editing outputs to the LCSH vocabulary lifts subject-heading prediction F1 from 0.135 to 0.300 on a 2,100-book test set.

Pith tools