Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Nightshade: Prompt-Specific Poisoning Attacks on Text-to-Image Generative Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.13828 v3 pith:P64GBYYK submitted 2023-10-20 cs.CR cs.AI

classification cs.CRcs.AI
keywords attacksnightshadepoisoningmodelspoisontraininggenerativesamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data poisoning attacks manipulate training data to introduce unexpected behaviors into machine learning models at training time. For text-to-image generative models with massive training datasets, current understanding of poisoning attacks suggests that a successful attack would require injecting millions of poison samples into their training pipeline. In this paper, we show that poisoning attacks can be successful on generative models. We observe that training data per concept can be quite limited in these models, making them vulnerable to prompt-specific poisoning attacks, which target a model's ability to respond to individual prompts. We introduce Nightshade, an optimized prompt-specific poisoning attack where poison samples look visually identical to benign images with matching text prompts. Nightshade poison samples are also optimized for potency and can corrupt an Stable Diffusion SDXL prompt in <100 poison samples. Nightshade poison effects "bleed through" to related concepts, and multiple attacks can composed together in a single prompt. Surprisingly, we show that a moderate number of Nightshade attacks can destabilize general features in a text-to-image generative model, effectively disabling its ability to generate meaningful images. Finally, we propose the use of Nightshade and similar tools as a last defense for content creators against web scrapers that ignore opt-out/do-not-crawl directives, and discuss possible implications for model trainers and content creators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Security of World-Model-Based Embodied AI: A Lifecycle of Threats, Defenses, and Evaluation

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    World-model-based embodied AI creates a predictive security boundary where attacks on data, sensors, imagination, ranking, and feedback can turn into unsafe physical action and false safety certificates.

  2. MaRVL-QA: A Benchmark for Mathematical Reasoning over Visual Landscapes

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MaRVL-QA is a new benchmark that tests multimodal AI systems on mathematical reasoning over surface plots, with two tasks: counting topological features and recognizing geometric transformations.

  3. Unveiling Unicode's Unseen Underpinnings in Undermining Authorship Attribution

    cs.CR 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper argues, without completed experiments, that zero-width Unicode steganography could be layered on top of imitation, translation, and obfuscation to evade stylometric authorship attribution.

  4. Unveiling Unicode's Unseen Underpinnings in Undermining Authorship Attribution

    cs.CR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper proposes integrating Unicode steganography into adversarial stylometry to undermine authorship attribution.

  5. Rethinking the A in STEAM: Insights from and for AI Literacy Education

    cs.CY 2024-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Advocates robust inclusion of arts in STEAM education to support holistic AI literacy in K-12 by addressing media representations, anthropomorphism, societal biases, and generative AI impacts.

Pith tools