Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Performative Prediction: Past and Future

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16608 v2 pith:I4NVZNU6 submitted 2023-10-25 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords performativeperformativitypredictionlearningmachinenotionpredictionsdigital
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predictions in the social world generally influence the target of prediction, a phenomenon known as performativity. Self-fulfilling and self-negating predictions are examples of performativity. Of fundamental importance to economics, finance, and the social sciences, the notion has been absent from the development of machine learning that builds on the static perspective of pattern recognition. In machine learning applications, however, performativity often surfaces as distribution shift. A predictive model deployed on a digital platform, for example, influences behavior and thereby changes the data-generating distribution. We discuss the recently founded area of performative prediction that provides a definition and conceptual framework to study performativity in machine learning. A key element of performative prediction is a natural equilibrium notion that gives rise to new optimization challenges. What emerges is a distinction between learning and steering, two mechanisms at play in performative prediction. Steering is in turn intimately related to questions of power in digital markets. The notion of performative power that we review gives an answer to the question how much a platform can steer participants through its predictions. We end on a discussion of future directions, such as the role that performativity plays in contesting algorithmic systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Conformal CBF and CLF Controllers via Iterative Policy Updates

    eess.SY 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An iterative conformal-prediction update rule transfers probabilistic safety/stability guarantees across changing robust CBF/CLF policies despite policy-induced distribution shift.

  2. Optimal Regularization for Performative Learning

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimal ridge regularization in performative linear regression is set by the mean performative strength, and over-parameterization can turn a self-reinforcing performative effect into a lower optimally tuned risk.

  3. Performative Risk Control: Calibrating Models for Reliable Deployment under Performativity

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An iterative threshold calibration method, Performative Risk Control, gives finite-sample guarantees that risk stays controlled under performative (self-influencing) distribution shifts.

Pith tools