Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Accelerated Bayesian Inference for Molecular Simulations using Local Gaussian Process Surrogate Models

Chemical Physics · Submitted 29 Oct 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We conclude that LGPs are robust and efficient surrogate models, poised to expand the application of Bayesian inference in molecular simulations to a broad spectrum of ever-advancing experimental data.

how it is stated · asserted 0.77 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2310.19108 (version 2)
Pith IDL7SMI4LX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. R. Shazed, B. L. Shanks, H. W. Sullivan, M. P. Hoepfner. "Accelerated Bayesian Inference for Molecular Simulations using Local Gaussian Process Surrogate Models." arXiv:2310.19108 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/L7SMI4LX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,979 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.58 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

While Bayesian inference is the gold standard for uncertainty quantification and propagation, its use within physical chemistry encounters formidable computational barriers. These bottlenecks are magnified for modeling data with many independent variables, such as X-ray/neutron scattering patterns and electromagnetic spectra. To address this challenge, we apply a Bayesian framework accelerated via local Gaussian process (LGP) surrogate models. We show that the time-complexity of LGPs scales linearly in the number of independent variables, in stark contrast to the computationally expensive cubic scaling of conventional Gaussian processes. To illustrate the method, we trained a LGP surrogate model on the experimental radial distribution function of liquid neon, and observed a remarkable 288,000-fold speed-up compared to molecular dynamics with insignificant loss in predictive accuracy. We conclude that LGPs are robust and efficient surrogate models, poised to expand the application of Bayesian inference in molecular simulations to a broad spectrum of ever-advancing experimental data.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 While Bayesian inference is the gold standard for uncertainty quantification and propagation, its use within physical chemistry encounters formidable computational barriers. background 0.98 0.07 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 These bottlenecks are magnified for modeling data with many independent variables, such as X-ray/neutron scattering patterns and electromagnetic spectra. background 0.98 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 To address this challenge, we apply a Bayesian framework accelerated via local Gaussian process (LGP) surrogate models. method 0.69 0.90 0.05 asserted 0.96
s3 We show that the time-complexity of LGPs scales linearly in the number of independent variables, in stark contrast to the computationally expensive cubic scaling of conventional Gaussian processes. result 0.91 0.81 0.12 asserted 1.00
s4 To illustrate the method, we trained a LGP surrogate model on the experimental radial distribution function of liquid neon, and observed a remarkable 288,000-fold speed-up compared to molecular dynamics with insignificant loss in predictive accuracy. result 1.00 0.97 0.08 asserted 1.00
s5 We conclude that LGPs are robust and efficient surrogate models, poised to expand the application of Bayesian inference in molecular simulations to a broad spectrum of ever-advancing experimental data. interpretation 0.94 0.40 0.97 asserted 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.91.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

While Bayesian inference is the gold standard for uncertainty quantification and propagation, its use within physical chemistry encounters formidable computational barriers. These bottlenecks are magnified for modeling data with many independent variables, such as X-ray/neutron scattering patterns and electromagnetic spectra. To address this challenge, we apply a Bayesian framework accelerated via local Gaussian process (LGP) surrogate models. We show that the time-complexity of LGPs scales linearly in the number of independent variables, in stark contrast to the computationally expensive cubic scaling of conventional Gaussian processes. To illustrate the method, we trained a LGP surrogate model on the experimental radial distribution function of liquid neon, and observed a remarkable 288,000-fold speed-up compared to molecular dynamics with insignificant loss in predictive accuracy. We conclude that LGPs are robust and efficient surrogate models, poised to expand the application of Bayesian inference in molecular simulations to a broad spectrum of ever-advancing experimental data.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.