Pith. Sign in

RECORD

BasisFormer: Attention-based Time Series Forecasting with Learnable and Interpretable Basis

Machine Learning · Submitted 31 Oct 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Through extensive experiments on six datasets, we demonstrate that BasisFormer outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by 11.04\% and 15.78\% respectively for univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2310.20496 (version 2)
Pith IDW64HX7GX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHang Yu, Jianguo Li, Shizhan Liu, Weiyao Lin, Zelin Ni. "BasisFormer: Attention-based Time Series Forecasting with Learnable and Interpretable Basis." arXiv:2310.20496 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/W64HX7GX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,994 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.49 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.99.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Bases have become an integral part of modern deep learning-based models for time series forecasting due to their ability to act as feature extractors or future references. To be effective, a basis must be tailored to the specific set of time series data and exhibit distinct correlation with each time series within the set. However, current state-of-the-art methods are limited in their ability to satisfy both of these requirements simultaneously. To address this challenge, we propose BasisFormer, an end-to-end time series forecasting architecture that leverages learnable and interpretable bases. This architecture comprises three components: First, we acquire bases through adaptive self-supervised learning, which treats the historical and future sections of the time series as two distinct views and employs contrastive learning. Next, we design a Coef module that calculates the similarity coefficients between the time series and bases in the historical view via bidirectional cross-attention. Finally, we present a Forecast module that selects and consolidates the bases in the future view based on the similarity coefficients, resulting in accurate future predictions. Through extensive experiments on six datasets, we demonstrate that BasisFormer outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by 11.04\% and 15.78\% respectively for univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/nzl5116190/Basisformer}

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Bases have become an integral part of modern deep learning-based models for time series forecasting due to their ability to act as feature extractors or future references. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 To be effective, a basis must be tailored to the specific set of time series data and exhibit distinct correlation with each time series within the set. background 0.98 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 However, current state-of-the-art methods are limited in their ability to satisfy both of these requirements simultaneously. gap 0.98 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 To address this challenge, we propose BasisFormer, an end-to-end time series forecasting architecture that leverages learnable and interpretable bases. contribution 1.00 0.84 0.08 asserted 0.99
s4 This architecture comprises three components: First, we acquire bases through adaptive self-supervised learning, which treats the historical and future sections of the time series as two distinct views and employs contrastive learning. method 0.97 0.92 0.03 asserted 0.98
s5 Next, we design a Coef module that calculates the similarity coefficients between the time series and bases in the historical view via bidirectional cross-attention. method 0.98 0.92 0.02 asserted 0.99
s6 Finally, we present a Forecast module that selects and consolidates the bases in the future view based on the similarity coefficients, resulting in accurate future predictions. method 0.99 0.92 0.07 asserted 1.00
s7 Through extensive experiments on six datasets, we demonstrate that BasisFormer outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by 11.04\% and 15.78\% respectively for univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks. result 1.00 0.97 0.80 asserted 1.00
s8 Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/nzl5116190/Basisformer} contribution 0.67 0.31 0.02 asserted 0.85

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Bases have become an integral part of modern deep learning-based models for time series forecasting due to their ability to act as feature extractors or future references. To be effective, a basis must be tailored to the specific set of time series data and exhibit distinct correlation with each time series within the set. However, current state-of-the-art methods are limited in their ability to satisfy both of these requirements simultaneously. To address this challenge, we propose BasisFormer, an end-to-end time series forecasting architecture that leverages learnable and interpretable bases. This architecture comprises three components: First, we acquire bases through adaptive self-supervised learning, which treats the historical and future sections of the time series as two distinct views and employs contrastive learning. Next, we design a Coef module that calculates the similarity coefficients between the time series and bases in the historical view via bidirectional cross-attention. Finally, we present a Forecast module that selects and consolidates the bases in the future view based on the similarity coefficients, resulting in accurate future predictions. Through extensive experiments on six datasets, we demonstrate that BasisFormer outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by 11.04\% and 15.78\% respectively for univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/nzl5116190/Basisformer}

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 21 sentences without a confident label

Compares with 4 papers
  • Models for comparison: In this study, we compare our proposed model against the following state-of-the-art models: four transformer-based models, namely FEDformer [ref] , Autoformer [ref] , Pyraformer [ref] ; one MLP-based model, i.e., Dlinear [ref] ; and one CNN-based model, i.e., TCN [ref] .

    An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling · Experiments · 1.00

  • Models for comparison: In this study, we compare our proposed model against the following state-of-the-art models: four transformer-based models, namely FEDformer [ref] , Autoformer [ref] , Pyraformer [ref] ; one MLP-based model, i.e., Dlinear [ref] ; and one CNN-based model, i.e., TCN [ref] .

    FEDformer: Frequency Enhanced Decomposed Transformer for Long-term Series Forecasting · Experiments · 1.00

  • Models for comparison: In this study, we compare our proposed model against the following state-of-the-art models: four transformer-based models, namely FEDformer [ref] , Autoformer [ref] , Pyraformer [ref] ; one MLP-based model, i.e., Dlinear [ref] ; and one CNN-based model, i.e., TCN [ref] .

    Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting? · Experiments · 1.00

Cites as background 8 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.